Homo Erectus 340
1,011,469 99%
Homo Erectus 340
3 years ago
,jpeg/018/979/720/v2/320x180.240.jpg)
,jpeg/016/077/202/v2/320x180.222.jpg)
,jpeg/024/053/791/v2/320x180.235.jpg)
,jpeg/021/409/192/v2/320x180.277.jpg)
,jpeg/018/749/251/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/011/574/294/v2/320x180.205.jpg)
,jpeg/008/836/516/v2/320x180.264.jpg)
,jpeg/006/957/079/v2/320x180.230.jpg)
,jpeg/016/453/112/v2/320x180.210.jpg)
,jpeg/018/206/012/v2/320x180.247.jpg)
,jpeg/017/561/399/v2/320x180.249.jpg)
Not the people in the comments complaining about historic accuracy ajskdjfjgk
Reply
They should have used make-up to cover the tattoos. I imagine those would be pretty uncommon in the 1860s. I find it immersion-breaking. Especially the porno-y placement.
Reply
michael1962123 6 months ago
to BiBearBe : Two hot men. Had me going til the I saw the condom.
Reply Show original comment